Sign up to receive updates from Randy.
Randy's Blog Facebook
MySpace YouTube
Washington DC Office
District Office
Email Randy
Home   /   Blog
MONTHLY ARCHIVES

Work Out, Not Bailout
by Randy
September 29th, 2008

Today, the Financial Rescue Plan or the $700 billion dollar taxpayer funded bailout, failed to get enough support from either side of the aisle to pass.  I, as many of you know, did not support the plan because of its failure to protect the taxpayers. This bailout failed to address the fundamental cause that created this problem and failed to lessen the credit and housing crunch. It creates the largest national debt in U.S. history, forcing generations of taxpayers to pick up the tab for Wall Street losses.

Since the beginning of this crisis, I have stated that I would not support a taxpayer funded bailout of irresponsible lenders and borrows. Although the plan was considerably better than the Bush Administration’s proposal of last week, including important provisions to eliminate CEO and Wall Street Executive’s golden parachute and increasing Wall Street accountability, mere improvements were not enough to gain my support.

There are alternatives to the Paulsen/Pelosi plan and today I cosponsored a plan that allows Wall Street to work this out and not bail them out. We must now come together solve this crisis in a way that the American people support.

To read my statement regarding the vote click here.

 To read my statement regarding the plan I cosponsored click here.

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | 24 Comments | Trackback


No Taxpayer Funded Bailout!!
by Randy
September 26th, 2008

Over the last six months we have watched as our financial institutions began to unravel starting with the take over of Bear Sterns by JP Morgan which was brokered by the government. The unraveling continued to progress as we watched Fannie and Freddie placed under government control and Lehman Brothers, an investment bank which has been around for over 150 years and one that survived the Great Depression, suddenly collapse.  At that same time Merrill Lynch took shelter under the wings of Bank of America and AIG was taken over by the government.  Most recently announced was the take over of Washington Mutual (WaMu) by JP Morgan. All of these events have led and contributed to our current economic crisis and it is now in the hands of legislators to do what is best for the American people.

Today, I released a statement saying that I am OPPOSED to the Bush Administrations $700 billion proposal. I am opposed to any plan that allows Wall Street executives to walk away with millions of taxpayer dollars accumulating in their bank accounts. This plan cannot and should not be a taxpayer funded bailout. Private companies will have to carry the financial burden in any rescue plan that I will support.

Over the last three days I have received over 500 phone calls and emails from you, my constituents, regarding the Bush Administrations proposal. I believe that all congressional action must be centered on protecting those who have done the right thing, those who took responsible home loans and have worked so hard to keep up with their obligations as the faltering economy has made it harder to do so. The economic livelihood of this country is the most important issue that my colleagues and I will take up and as such I feel it is vital to hear from all of my constituents. I urge you all to comment on this blog posting, call any of my offices, or email me and let me know your thoughts on the proposed financial market rescue plan.

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | 22 Comments | Trackback


Editorials React to “No Energy” Energy Bill
by Randy
September 23rd, 2008

Last week Speaker Pelosi and the House Democrats pushed through partisan energy legislation which does not address the needs of the American people.  One week later the editorial pages of newspapers across our country are calling out the Democrats for their phony attempts and these quotes expose exactly what the Democrats have not done when it comes to our energy crisis.

  •  “Which is why it was doubly disappointing to survey the energy bill passed by the U.S. House last week. Swiftly engineered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic allies, it’s a limp-wristed approach to pressing energy problems.  In seeking to appease everyone, it satisfies no one, offshore drilling enthusiasts and environmentalists included.” (“Energy Package Stalls Out: Hastily Passed House Bill Appears Dead in Water,” Waco Tribune Editorial, September 22, 2008)

  • “This way, Democrats can claim to be opening the way to offshore drilling…under the restrictions included in the bill, no real drilling is likely to happen.” (“Drilling Bill Lacks Substance,” Buffalo News Editorial, September 22, 2008)

  • “This just in: Nothing.  That’s what this Congress came up with, after months of high fuel costs and concern over our dependence on foreign oil, and after a summer recess in which senators and representatives could have listened to the American people but did not. Congress came up with nothing — a fake energy exploration bill that would only weaken America. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is devoting her career to blocking new energy for America, allowed a bill that would permit drilling for oil 100 miles offshore, which is prohibitive.  Under the bill, coastal states could go 50 miles closer in — but have no incentive to, as the Democrats’ bill doesn’t share revenues with the states.” (“They’ve Blown a Ruse; Congress Fails Yet Again,” Augusta Chronicle Editorial, September 21, 2008)

  • “If House Democrats were looking to give Americans relief at the gas pump in the energy legislation passed on Sept. 16, they failed.  In a jarring twist, the legislation offers a solution and then negates it.  If Americans were hoping for at least half a loaf from this legislation, they were disappointed.” (“Energy Legislation Less Than Half a Loaf,” Reading Eagle Editorial, September 20, 2008)

  • “Don’t be fooled by House Democrats’ disingenuous bill to lift the federal government’s ban on offshore oil drilling.  Rather than address a shortage of supply in the face of growing demand, the bill seeks to appease angry voters without harming the Democrats’ mission to force America off fossil fuels… This isn’t a bill intended to tap vast untapped reserves.  It’s a bill intended to give voters the impression that Democrats favor offshore drilling — while maintaining their opposition to it.” (“Drilling for Political Advantage,” Northwest Florida Daily News Editorial, September 20, 2008)

  • “Coming next week from Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats: legislation that allows oil and gas drilling on the moon!  The bill would have the same result as energy legislation passed Tuesday - no increase in domestic oil production - and it certainly wouldn’t be any less cynical…The Democrats’ intent here is so transparent it’s embarrassing.  Americans know the country needs to use all its resources to power the future and speed economic recovery. That includes offshore oil drilling - where the oil is.” (“Let’s Drill for Oil — Where There Isn’t Any,” Las Vegas Review Journal Editorial, September 19, 2008)

  • “Pelosi, who opposes new drilling for American oil, allowed the vote only because this summer Democrats were on the wrong side of offshore exploration, which seven in 10 Americans favor.  Unfortunately, the House-passed bill is nothing more than a fig leaf for Democrats as they prepare to face frustrated voters in November.” (“Same Old Drill: ‘No-Energy’ Bill Risks Voter Wrath,” The Oklahoman Editorial, September 19, 2008)

  • “The sudden pro-drilling makeover of the Pelosi Democrats has always had an air – a gale, really –  of election-year convenience, and the House proved it Tuesday by passing an energy bill that would put any bunko man to shame. This confidence trick won’t expand domestic oil-and-gas supplies even a bit… As Congress runs down the clock for this term, the likelihood of reaching some grand pre-election energy bargain is vanishing fast.  The House bill shows that the Pelosi Democrats simply aren’t serious about expanding domestic energy supplies.” (“Pelosi’s Drilling Ruse,” Wall Street Journal Editorial, September 19, 2008)

  • “Congress may as well close the windows, lock the doors and take a vacation. I f the energy bill the House passed Tuesday night is any indication, the lower chamber is already out to lunch… The House this week finally responded, tweaking the drilling bans just enough to pass a bill that Republican leader John Boehner correctly calls ‘a hoax.’” (“Energy Bill is a Dry Well,” Bend Bulletin Editorial (OR), September 19, 2008)

  • “On Tuesday, House Democrats made an embarrassingly weak attempt to protect themselves… Therefore, House leaders produced a “compromise bill” and quickly moved it to a vote.  It passed along largely party lines, and Democratic incumbents in tight races can claim they voted for drilling.  Voters should not fall for that old trick.” (“Democrats Drill for Political Cover,” Roanoke Times Editorial, September 18, 2008) 

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


Bipartisan Legislation
by Randy
September 18th, 2008

Almost two days have passed since the Democratic majority was able to pass their partisan energy legislation in the House.  And although, the House Democrats claim they want to stimulate the economy, their energy legislation does not address the call for more American oil by the American people.  The small detail about the vote two night’s ago which has escaped the public eye is the fact that a bipartisan energy bill, authored by Rep. John Peterson (R-PA) and Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), was also up for a vote, and all 24 Democrats who had cosponsored the legislation voted it down.

I have found that it is a sad day on the floor of the House when party politics interferes with addressing the concerns of the American people. All 24 of my Democratic colleagues who voiced their support of the Peterson-Abercrombie legislation through statements and co-sponsorship flip-flopped, proving that the Democrats are once again unwilling to create bipartisan legislation. This hoax by the House democrats is purely a political move to try and protect their own vulnerable seats going into the November election.  Speaker Pelosi and her leadership team have yet again denied Republicans the opportunity to bring the “American Energy Act” to the floor for a proper debate and vote. The Democrats know that the legislation passed last night will not move past the House, yet they continue to play games with the wallets of the American people.

My Republican colleagues and I have not given up the fight to bring economic relief to the pump and we will continue to push for a vote on the American Energy Act so that the people of our great nation no longer suffer.  I have pledged my support for this legislation and will not take a page out of the book of the Democrats and turn my back on something I believe in.

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


“Fix Washington” Project
by Randy
September 15th, 2008

On May 16th, I announced the start of the “Fix Washington” Project in the district. Four months and 650 votes later, I am happy to announce the idea with the most votes was, ‘impose term limits on all members of Congress - U.S. House of Representative should be limited to six terms (12yrs) and U.S. Senators two terms (12yrs).’ That idea received 43% of the votes and surpassed the runner-up idea by 120 votes.

Later this week I will introduce this legislation as a Constitutional amendment on the floor of the house.  As many of you know, in order for the amendment to be added to the Constitution, it must be ratified by a two-thirds majority of both houses of Congress and by three quarters of the states.Although the “Fix Washington” Project has come to a close I want to encourage everyone in my district to continue getting involved in the legislative process.  I welcome all of my constituents to call or email our office to let me know your legislative ideas. As your elected representative it is my job to make sure that your thoughts and ideas are heard so that together we can make this country a better place to live.

The winning idea was suggested by Armand Marianetti, Farmington; John Gobe, Stanley; Peter Haidt, Pittsford; Mary Kelly, Ellicottville; Janis Becker, Caneadea; Martin Adduci, Machias; Dave Zacharias, Canandaigua; Robert Rutt, Rochester; Alexander Hoffarth, Fairport; Duane Granger, Pittsford.

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | 1 Comment | Trackback


Fix Washington Project
by Randy
September 8th, 2008

With the Congressional recess finally at an end, I wanted to take a moment to remind everyone that there are only five days left to vote on the selected legislative ideas for the “Fix Washington” Project which will close at 5pm on September 12, 2008.  Over the last eight weeks, over 600 people have logged onto my website to cast their vote for their favorite legislative idea.  This is a great chance for individuals to voice their opinions and ideas on what the federal government needs to do in Washington.  I want to encourage all of my constituents to participate because the idea with the most votes will be  introduced on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Click here to vote

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


This morning’s Top 10 List of Broken Promises to the American People:
by Randy
August 20th, 2008

10) Every person in America has a right to have his or her voice heard.  –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

9) No Member of Congress should be silenced on the floor, as has been the practice of Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives.  –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

8 There should be regular consultations among the elected leaders of parties to discuss scheduling, administration and operations of the House. –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

7) There will be Bipartisan Administration of the House. –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

6) Regular meetings between Chairs and Ranking Members of committees and staffs should be held.  –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

5) Bills should be developed following full hearings and open subcommittee and committee markups, with appropriate referrals to other committees. Members should have at least 24 hours to examine a bill prior to consideration at the subcommittee level. –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

4) Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full, and fair debate consisting of a full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives, including a substitute. –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

3) Members should have at least 24 hours to examine bill and conference report text prior to floor consideration. Rules governing floor debate must be reported before 10 p.m. for a bill to be considered the following day. –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

2) House-Senate conference committees should hold regular meetings (at least weekly) of all conference committee Members. All duly-appointed conferees should be informed of the schedule of conference committee activities in a timely manner and given ample opportunity for input and debate as decisions are made toward final bill language.  –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

1) And maybe the biggest sham so far - The Suspension Calendar should be restricted to non-controversial legislation, with minority-authored legislation scheduled in relation to the party ratio in the House.  –Ignored by this Democrat Majority

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


“Debunking three ‘truths’ about offshore drilling” and Protest Update
by Randy
August 12th, 2008

Today is Day 11 of the House GOP’s historic nationwide protest. Last night, CNN host Larry King asked Speaker Pelosi if she would call Congress back into session, Speaker Pelosi said, in part, “[T]hey have this thing that says, drill offshore in the protected areas.  Well we can do that.  We can have a vote on that.”

Today, in our press conference and when speaking on the floor we asked the Speaker to keep her word and allow a vote on drilling offshore. But even if she allows a vote, why is she waiting for another four weeks to tackle this issue? House Republicans are here and have been here since August 1st. We asked her to cancel her book tour and call Congress back into session.

On another note, I hope you all got to see this morning’s Washington Post editorial “Snake Oil.” The editorial calls for “Long-Term, Comprehensive Plan” to solve our Nation’s energy crisis and debunks three ‘truths’ Click here to read it  

With the roaring economies of China and India gobbling up oil in the two countries’ latter-day industrial revolutions, the United States can no longer afford to turn its back on finding all the sources of fuel necessary to maintain its economy and its standard of living. What’s required is a long-term, comprehensive plan that includes wind, solar, geothermal, biofuels and nuclear — and that acknowledges that oil and gas will be instrumental to the U.S. economy for many years to come.”

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


“Saving the planet”
by Randy
July 29th, 2008

Yesterday in an interview with Politico, Speaker Pelosi declared that the reason that she is refusing to allow a debate and vote on energy legislation is because she’s, “trying to save the planet.”  In a TV interview this morning on FOX News, Republican Leader Boehner responded directly to the Speaker’s latest excuse:

MEGYN KELLY:  Here’s what the Speaker said.  I have it here so bear with me while I read it.  She said when pressed on what she’s not allowing this to go for a vote, “I am trying to save the planet.  I am trying to save the planet.  I will not have this debate trivialized by their excuse,” meaning Republicans, “for their failed policy.”  Any response?

BOEHNER:  Megyn, for 25 years, Democrats have blocked more American-made oil and gas.  That is why we are in the predicament we are in.  That is why 70 percent of our energy comes from overseas.  And she has time to go out and promote her book tour and her new book, but she does not have time to schedule a vote on the floor of the House and let the American people have their will expressed.  I mean, we got elected to Congress to go there and represent our constituents.  They want us to vote on more American-made oil and gas.  We want to do that.  She, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama are standing in the way.

Congress only has four legislative days before the August District Work Period. The time for talk to long past and we need to act now on legislation that will lower the price at the pump. Democrats have four more legislative days to listen to the will of the American people and allow a vote on energy exploration, conservation and innovation and increasing American-made energy all to lower gas prices.

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback


Five Ideas Selected for the “Fix Washington” Project
by Randy
July 22nd, 2008

Over the last two months hundreds of you have emailed, faxed, and called in your ideas on how to Fix Washington. Today the five selected ideas went live on my website so you can vote on the idea that you think will fix DC. I again want to thank all of you who submitted your ideas and feel free to call or email me anytime to tell me your ideas on how to make this country a better place for you and your family.

The five solutions:

1.      Make Stop-Loss illegal. Suggested by Andrew Anissi, Pittsford, NY (Stop-Loss is an involuntary extension of one’s military service, typically at the end of a tour of duty, due to unit requirements.)

2.      Allocate a percentage of NASA’s annual funding to go toward studying alternative energy. Suggested by Elaine Johnson, Pittsford, NY

3.      Award a $75 million prize to the college, university, or private sector organization that finds an economically viable alternative for gasoline. Suggested by Cindy Bacchetta, Pittsford, NY

4.      Make universal default on credit cards illegal. Suggested by David Matz, Bonaventure, NY.  (A Universal Default Clause states that a creditor can raise your interest rate if you have been late on any of your loans.)

5.      Impose term limits on all members of Congress. U.S. Representatives should be limited to six two-year terms (12yrs) and U.S. Senators to two six-year terms (12yrs). Suggested by Armand Marianetti, Farmington; John Gobe, Stanley; Peter Haidt, Pittsford; Mary Kelly, Ellicottville; Janis Becker, Caneadea; Martin Adduci, Machias; Dave Zacharias, Canandaigua; Robert Rutt, Rochester; Alexander Hoffarth, Fairport; Duane Granger, Pittsford

You have until September 12, 2008 to vote for your favorite idea. The solution that receives the most votes will be introduced on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

To vote on one of the five ideas visit - click here

READ MORE | Permalink | RSS Feed | No Comments | Trackback